25–30 May 2025
Daejeon Convention Center (DCC)
Asia/Seoul timezone

β-decay of $^{68}$Mn: Probing the N=40 island of inversion

27 May 2025, 12:20
15m
Room 10: 1F #107 (DCC)

Room 10: 1F #107

DCC

Contributed Oral Presentation Nuclear Structure Parallel Session

Speaker

Ms Rashmi Umashankar (TRIUMF)

Description

Although the shell model is fundamental to our understanding of nuclear structure, the breakdown of traditional magic numbers far from stability provides insight into the nature of the underlying nuclear interactions and acts as a tool to test existing models. Islands of inversion (IoI) in the nuclear landscape are characterized by the presence of deformed multi-particle multi-hole (npnh) ground states instead of the (0$\textit{p}$0$\textit{h}$) configurations predicted by spherical mean-field calculations. This is typically driven by the strong nuclear quadrupole-quadrupole interaction that induces shape transitions, wherein these highly correlated "intruder" states become more bound than spherical ones.

In the N=40 region, the relatively large energy gap separating the pf shell from the $\nu$$\textit{g}_{9/2}$ orbital points towards a strong sub-shell closure at N=40 which has been supported by the observation of a high-lying 2$^{+}$ state and low $\textit{B}$($\textit{E}$2) value in $^{68}$Ni (Z=28) [1]. However, systematics of $\textit{E}$(2$^{+}$) and $\textit{B}$($\textit{E}$2) values have indicated a sudden increase in collectivity below Z=28 when approaching N=40, seen especially in the rapid drop of $\textit{E}$(2$^{+}$) in Fe (Z=26) and Cr (Z=24) isotopes [2,3]. This increase in collectivity is thought to be due to the neutron occupation of intruder states from a higher shell, similar to the IoI around N=20 [4,5].

Shape coexistence also manifests in nuclei at the boundaries of IoIs [6]. In the N=40 region, low-lying 0$^{+}$ excited states, which are traditional indicators of shape coexistence have been identified up to A=66 [7,8]. In $^{68}$Fe, a state at 2035 keV is tentatively assigned as 0$^{+}$ or 2$^{+}$ and the confirmation of this spin would indicate whether this trend extends past N=40. Recent studies also suggest the occurrence of a new IoI at N=50 and a proposed merging of the N=40 and N=50 IoIs, equivalent to the one observed between N=20 and N=28 [9,10,11].

To explore these phenomena, an experiment was performed at TRIUMF-ISAC using the GRIFFIN spectrometer that utilized the $\beta$- and $\beta$n decay of $^{68}$Mn to populate excited states in $^{67,68}$Fe, $^{67,68}$Co and $^{67,68}$Ni. This experiment produced the highest-statistics data set to date for these isotopes. Consequently, we have greatly expanded the level scheme of $^{68}$Fe and measured key observables such as $\gamma$-ray intensities and branching ratios. A comprehensive level scheme of $^{67}$Fe populated through the $\beta$n decay has been established for the first time along with a re-measurement of the P$_{n}$ value. Angular correlation analysis, which will provide firm assignments of spins and parities of low-lying excited states, is underway. We have new information on the spin assignment of the 2035 keV level in $^{68}$Fe which leads to a reinterpretation of shape coexistence in this nucleus. This, along with other preliminary results, will be presented and discussed.

[1] O. Sorlin et al. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (9 Feb. 2002), p. 092501.
[2] S. Naimi et al. In: Phys. Rev. C 86 (1 July 2012), p. 014325.
[3] M. Hannawald et al. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (7 Feb. 1999), pp. 1391–1394.
[4] S. M. Lenzi et al. In: Phys. Rev. C 82 (5 Nov. 2010), p. 054301.
[5] Y. Tsunoda et al. In: Phys. Rev. C 89 (3 Mar. 2014), p. 031301.
[6] M. Rocchini et al. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (12 Mar. 2023), p. 122502.
[7] Balraj Singh. In: Nuclear Data Sheets 108.2 (2007), pp. 197–364.
[8] S. N. Liddick et al. In: Phys. Rev. C 87 (1 Jan. 2013), p. 014325.
[9] C. Santamaria et al. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (19 Nov. 2015), p. 192501.
[10] E. Caurier, F. Nowacki, and A. Poves. In: Phys. Rev. C 90 (1 July 2014), p. 014302.
[11] F. Nowacki et al. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (27 Dec. 2016), p. 272501.

Primary author

Co-authors

Dr Adam Garnsworthy (TRIUMF) Dr Bruno Olaizola (IEM-CSIC) Prof. Carl Svensson (University of Guelph) Dr Chris Griffin (TRIUMF) Dr Connor Natzke Prof. Corina Andreoiu (Simon Fraser University) Dr Daniel Yates (TRIUMF) Mr Dhruval Shah (McMaster University) Dr Eleanor Dunling (TRIUMF) Mr Eric Gyabeng Fuakye (University of Regina) Dr Fatima Garcia Dr Gordon Ball (TRIUMF) Dr Greg Hackman (TRIUMF) Mr Guy Leckenby (TRIUMF/UBC) Prof. Gwen Grinyer (University of Regina) Dr Iris Dillmann (TRIUMF) Dr James Smallcombe (Japan Atomic Energy Agency) Dr Kushal Kapoor Dr Magda Satrazani (KU Leuven) Dr Marco Rocchini (INFN) Dr Matthew Martin Ms Nastaran Saei Prof. Paul Garrett (University of Guelph) Dr Pietro Spagnoletti (University of Liverpool) Dr Rebeka Lubna (FRIB) Dr Roger Caballero-Folch (TRIUMF) Ms Samantha Buck (University of Guelph) Mr Shaun Georges (TRIUMF) Dr Soumendu Bhattacharjee Ms Tammy Zidar (University of Guelph) Dr Victoria Vedia (TRIUMF) Dr Yukiya Saito

Presentation materials